There are 2166 lenses in our database and 3526 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Sigma C 16 mm f/1.4 DC DN
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Sigma |
|---|---|
| Model | C 16 mm f/1.4 DC DN |
| Lens style | Wide angle |
| Focal length | 16 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.4 |
| Angle of view | 83.2 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.25 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:9.9 |
| Minimum aperture | 16 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
| Auto focus type | AF / MF |
| Lens Construction | 16 elements / 13 groups |
| Filter diameter | 67 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Micro Four Thirds Sony E Nikon Z Canon R Fujifilm X Canon EF-M L-mount/Leica-SL |
| Dimensions | 92.3 x 72.2 mm |
| Weight | 405 g |
| Additional information | Announced: 24.10.2017 2 aspherical elements, 2 special low dispersion elements, 3 "F" low dispersion elements |
Owners reviews (2)
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 350
User profile: Amateur
Cons: no
Pros: extremely sharp on my sony a6400 !
Summary: great !
Overall
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 300
User profile: Amateur
Cons: - Huge and heavy - Unreliable autofocus - Poor sharpness even stopped down to f/5,6 - Edges never become sharp - Strong copy to copy variations ?
Pros: - Good build quality - Good bokeh
Summary: I wonder if my sample had a problem because it was the worst lense I ever tested. Unfortunately I couldn\'t replace it because it was second hand so I just sent it back to the shop. Maybe another copy would be good but the one I got was not sharp at all. Even stopped down to f/4 or f/5,6 (sweet spot for a lot of micro 4/3 lenses), only the central area was ok. The lens might be better on APS-C since it was created for Sony cameras. I now got the 17mm f/1,2 and even if it was more expensive, it\'s night and day.