There are 2166 lenses in our database and 3526 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Canon EF 70-210 mm f/4
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Canon |
|---|---|
| Model | EF 70-210 mm f/4 |
| Lens style | Telephoto zoom |
| Focal length | 70 - 210 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 |
| Angle of view | 34.3 - 11.8 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 1.2 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:4.16 |
| Minimum aperture | 32 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 11 elements / 8 groups |
| Filter diameter | 58 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF |
| Dimensions | 75.6 x 137.6 mm |
| Weight | 605 g |
| Additional information | Marketed May 1987 |
Owners reviews (3)
Overall
Owner since: 5 years
Price: 200.00
User profile: Professional
Cons: Lens creep, rotating focus barrel, noisy focus, manual focus is not smooth, jerkey and hard to pin point focus.
Pros: Light, cheap and very sharp when stops are adjusted to f8 or f11. The images are comparable to the L lens around these stops. adequately fast focus. quality images when adjusted are appreciated by even the professionals.
Summary: Satisfied>
Overall
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 70
User profile: Amateur
Cons: No IS, separate MF and AF modes, extends on zooming, front element rotates on focussing, trombone-style zoom action.
Pros: The image quality is excellent. It is reasonably light and compact, yet solid and sturdy, and takes smallish (58mm) filters. As this is a discontinued lens its is available only second-hand, and as Canon has so many options in this focal length range (Inlcuding four 70-200 'L' lenses - both f/2.8 and f/4 versions, with or without IS) it costs very little second hand
Summary: It would be hard to get this IQ for such a low price anywhere else. For anyone that shoots action in good light it is a fantastic bargain.
Overall
Owner since: 3 years
Price: USD 200
User profile: Semipro
Cons: OK and not more. Rotating front element and no USM.
Pros: OK and not more. Should be cheap.
Summary: Why not? No worries about it being incompatible with newer bodies like many Sigmas from these years are.