There are 2160 lenses in our database and 3520 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Olympus Zuiko Digital 11-22 mm f/2.8-3.5
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Olympus |
|---|---|
| Model | Zuiko Digital 11-22 mm f/2.8-3.5 |
| Lens style | Wide angle zoom |
| Focal length | 11 - 22 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 - 3.5 |
| Angle of view | 89 - 53 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.28 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:7.7 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 7 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 12 elements / 10 groups |
| Filter diameter | 72 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Four Thirds |
| Dimensions | 75 x 92.5 mm |
| Weight | 485 g |
| Additional information |
Owners reviews (4)
Overall
Owner since: 5 years
Price: $800
User profile: Semipro
Cons: None
Pros: Super sharp, virtually no distortion, great color and contrast rendition. Focal range makes it an easy walk about lens covering a wide range (22 mm to 44 mm equivalent). Focuses very close. Takes ND filters for long exposures and night shots. Much sharper than 9-18 and less distortion than 12-60. Worth a few dolars more than 9-18.
Summary: The sharpest Olympus High Grade lens made - excpet for the 50 mm f/2 macro lens. Accepts filters. Great focal range. The wide end is very wide. Perfect for interior and exterior architecture without distortion. I've used this underwater in a housing with excellent results. It's better than the 7-14 mm f/4 SHG for underwater photography. The f/2.8-3.5 HG speed is excellent for low light scenics and street photography.
Overall
Owner since: 1 month
Price: £450
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Manual focus only for me with my Panasonic Lumix G1 micro four-thirds camera. Not a problem for Olympus owners though.
Pros: Extremely sharp focus and outstanding colour, especially with blue tones. I feel I got a very good deal on a high quality product. It's so superior to my (more versatile) kit lens that I'm reluctant to take it off.
Summary: You will never regret buying it and your main decision will be whether you're prepared to sacrifice image quality for even greater width, with the inferior 9-18mm or 10-20mm alternatives available.
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 450€
User profile: Semipro
Cons: a little to much cromatic aberration at the long end (11mm) price for a new one (800)
Pros: super/tack sharp, wider than 11mm, that meen its a 10mm in reality, very good construction-quality, very little distorsion and vignetting, my price (450 and nearly new!), fits beautiful on my E-3
Summary: one of the very best superwideangels, buy it!
Overall
Owner since: 3 years
Price: $600
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Not as versatile as 12-60mm.
Pros: Very sharp. Near to no distortion. Fast aperture. Considerably wider than 14mm.
Summary: This is probably my sharpest lens (vs 14-54 & 50-200), impressive considering this being a wide-angle lens! Hard choice now with 12-60mm and 9-18mm lenses also available. I would buy it again if in the same position again.