There are 2160 lenses in our database and 3520 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Sigma 120-400 mm f/4.5-5.6 APO DG OS HSM
Pictures:
Specifications:
Manufacturer | Sigma |
---|---|
Model | 120-400 mm f/4.5-5.6 APO DG OS HSM |
Lens style | Telephoto zoom |
Focal length | 120 - 400 mm |
Maximum aperture | f/4.5 - 5.6 |
Angle of view | 20.4 - 6.2 o |
Closest focusing distance | 1.5 m |
Maximum magnification | 1:4.2 |
Minimum aperture | 22 |
Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
Auto focus type | HSM |
Lens Construction | 21 elements / 15 groups |
Filter diameter | 77 mm |
Macro | No |
Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F Sony A / Minolta Pentax K |
Dimensions | 92.5 x 203.5 mm |
Weight | 1750 g |
Additional information | Three SLD glass elements |
Owners reviews (7)
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: The F that start in 4.5 in 120 and ends in 5.6 Its a little soft in the range of 350 to 400mm
Pros: Very very good build quality The OS works perfect Opticaly from 120 to 300mm its very similar to a canon f4 L lenses The tripod ring have god desing
Summary: Its to short the market options to get a 400mm lens with good qualitiy and good performance,with a competitive price, this lens is the best choise to benefits/costs.
Overall
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 430 euro (
User profile: Amateur
Cons: The following probably regard solely my sample as they don't coincide with what i have been reading about this lens. 1 Has a profound backfocus. 2. Sharpest apertures f/11-16 instead of f/8. 3. f/5.6 pictures are unusable. Exceeding the description of soft and described rather as blurry or out of focus. I also don't agree with the total matt finish : it's too delicate. Something like the Tokina AT-X Pro series finish would be way much more better choice in many aspects.
Pros: OS works well. Build quality.
Summary: Rather dissapointed with my sample. Too many issues gathered in a single piece. Currently investigating with local sigma authorized service what my options are. If this direction wont fix the issues, i am then replacing it with something else ASAP. The lens appears to have good sharpness potential WHEN i managed to get accurate focus ONLY MANUALLY and only at the sharpest aperture of f/13. So i guess the copies without the whatever problem is with my copy that produces around 2cm back-focus in close focus distance and unusable f/5.6 IQ - sharp peak @ f/11-f/16 should be indeed considered a very decent 400 zoom solution. I have seen acceptable - good (sharpness) pictures even @ f/5.6 from other users.
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price: $800
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Heavy
Pros: result usable
Summary: in general this is a swell lens
Overall
Owner since: 1 month
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: A Canon 70-200 L it is not
Pros: Good OS Nice Zoom and Manual Focus Rings
Summary: Overall a great lens for the money but for considersbly less you can purchase a Fuji HS10/20 with 24-740mm zoom that produces remarkable results and is just a percentage of the weight
Overall
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 530 GBP
User profile: Amateur
Cons: not actually a dream lens when it comes to size and weight ;)
Pros: very good OS, may very well be the best performing tele-lens in its price range, the IQ is actually better then expected, very nice MF control, feels very well made and smooth
Summary: a bargain lens for what it does.
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price: £595
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Sharpness of lens at 400mm Cannot use OS when on tripod
Pros: Can manually override autofocus Very comfortable to use No moving parts when focusing so use on beanbag
Summary: Excellent lens if a bit heavy. Excellent features for price with HSM and OS. Less sharp at full telephoto. Very good value for money - but the best costs more.
Overall
Owner since: 2 years
Price:
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Images often need sharpening in post processing but respond to same very easily. Much of this may be due to the haze which is often present for distant subjects Needs faster apertures to allow higher shutter speeds
Pros: Optical stabilisation appears to work very well Satisfactory sharpness No intrusive geometric errors or field use issues to speak of Good solid feel. Nice smooth operation.
Summary: Not as fast or as sharp as one might have wanted but then it was very reasonably priced. It appears very well built and operates very smoothly. Good (if not brilliant) consistent results - no real optical vices. Good stablisation and feels well balanced in use.