There are 2160 lenses in our database and 3520 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Canon TS-E 24 mm f/3.5L II
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Canon |
|---|---|
| Model | TS-E 24 mm f/3.5L II |
| Lens style | Wide angle |
| Focal length | 24 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5 |
| Angle of view | 84 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.21 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:2.94 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Auto focus type | MF |
| Lens Construction | 16 elements / 11 groups |
| Filter diameter | 82 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF |
| Dimensions | 88.5 x 106.9 mm |
| Weight | 780 g |
| Additional information |
Owners reviews (3)
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 1400 (2nd
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Focus scale could have been more detailed (there is nothing between 3m and infinite!) to help focusing without live-view. Even 8 diaphragm blades makes night shots (stars generated by city lights) not really spectacular (should have been 9 like last Sigma lenses!)
Pros: Everything else: impressive image quality (sharp at f/3.5 on the non-shifted picture, at f/9 for full shift), tilt-shift abilities, easy panorama with shifting, very short minimum focus distance, build quality, abilities to put 2 filters (ND400+graduated or polarizer for example) without vignetting. Great 'L' color rendering. No chroma aberrations.
Summary: Usable without tripod but one is necessary (+bubble level) to get the best of the lens. You need time to learn its usage.
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 2000 ̈́
User profile: Semipro
Cons: It's very big lens. The tilt / stift controls are placed too narrow so that it doesn't feel so great when adjusting the T/S.
Pros: superb image quality, T/S, great color rendering
Summary: If you are a serious landscape photographer, you should pick up this!
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Speciality manual focus lens - i e not all-around (used for landscape and architecture mainly). Relatively heavy. Tilt focusing requires modern high resolution live view display (5Dmk2 or similar) to not be a test of patience. Quite expensive lens in absolute numbers.
Pros: Shift and tilt very valuable for landscape/architecture. Very high image quality for being 24mm lens. More flexible movements than traditional tilt-shift lenses (can move tilt/shift independent of eachother, make diagonal tilts etc). Large image circle (67mm), means that maximum shift is rarely needed - better image quality.
Summary: If you're serious about landscape and architecture you want this lens.