There are 2160 lenses in our database and 3520 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Tokina AT-X 17 PRO AF 17 mm f/3.5
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Tokina |
|---|---|
| Model | AT-X 17 PRO AF 17 mm f/3.5 |
| Lens style | Wide angle |
| Focal length | 17 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5 |
| Angle of view | 103.4 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.25 m |
| Maximum magnification | - |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 11 elements / 9 groups |
| Filter diameter | 77 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F |
| Dimensions | 88 x 65 mm |
| Weight | 440 g |
| Additional information |
Owners reviews (3)
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 300
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Soft wide open, low contrast compared to Canon lenses. It has also the tendency to show CA like all Tokina lenses, it is kind of brand signature...
Pros: Well constructed, compact, low distorision and vignetting, light sharpness falloff in extreme corners. Soft wide open but it improves quickly and from f/5.6 sharpness is ok.
Summary: You can't go wrong with this well balanced ulta-wide lens. It is one of the few that can be used for arquitectural work without problems. It is not super-sharp but sharp enough for me and for many others I think. Quaity/price ratio is ridiculously high.
Overall
Owner since: 3 months
Price: $300
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Rotating focus ring, CA
Pros: IQ, low distortion, ghost and flare resistance
Summary: Good choice for ultra wide prime lens on FF
Overall
Owner since: 6 years
Price: 325$
User profile: Amateur
Cons: - on modern digital SLR only manual focus, but with AF confirm - resolution performance a bit outdated by todays standards - it's just not up to date anymore
Pros: - build like a tank is no exaggeration - virtually no distortion and no CA - sharp over all of the picture - compared to zooms it's optics are flawless - perfect Landscape prime for APS-C, equiv. to 28mm FF
Summary: I used it for a long time on the first Digital Rebel, before there have been decent Zooms starting @17/18mm out on the market. It was the perfekt outdoor landscape lens for me, but can be beaten by good zooms today when it comes to resolving power. I do not own it anymore, the 17-55 f2.8 IS is better in resolution at 17mm. But not in other aspects as the low level of distortion and CA is still unmatched by any zoom, I find.