Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM
11. Summary
- high build quality,
- quite handy, taking into account the lens’s parameters and the fact that it is equipped with IS and USM,
- excellent frame centre picture quality and very good at the borders,
- very low chromatic aberration,
- negligible distortion,
- invisible coma,
- low astigmatism,
- almost zero vignetting,
- quick, silent and accurate autofocus,
- rich accessories included in box.
Cons:
- average work against bright light,
- stabilization efficient only at the level of 2 EV.
The Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM is a very well-done lens, and the comparison between the cons and the pros can be the proof of it. Mind you the cons are the effect of the age – after all, the lens was launched 10 years ago. The 2 EV level of stabilization doesn’t impress anybody anymore – in the newest Canon and Nikon constructions we find 3-4 EV IS levels and in Olympus bodies – 3 EV. Using of newer coatings would help with the work against bright light for sure. As it was shown during the Canon’s EF 70-200 f/4L IS USM test, contemporary constructions also perform a lot better with converters attached.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Overall, it seems that the amateur and half-professional segment of the 300-400 mm lenses class is a bit neglected by manufacturers. Canon offer is only seemingly wide; it’s true that we have the 4/300 IS, tested here, and also an EF 400 mm f/5.6 L USM. The problem is that all these instruments are rather ancient, equipped with the first generation stabilization system or even without stabilization at all. A modernization is needed very much in this class; after all not everybody can afford more expensive models like a 2.8/300, a 2.8/400 or a 4/400 DO and also not everybody will be satisfied with a cheaper 70-300 IS USM.
Sample shots: