Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR
8. Vignetting
The best situation is at 50 mm, which does not mean it is acceptable. With a wide open aperture the light fall off in the corners of the frame reaches 21% (-0.66% the values of the diaphragm). When stopping down to f/5.6 the light fall off is down to 13%, while only when using f/8 can we reach a value of 7%.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When we get to the higher focal lengths, the situation is almost as bad as for the wide angle. For 100 mm and f/5.3 the light fall off in the corners of the frame reaches a value of 31% (-1.07 the value of the diaphragm). For f/8 it is still visible (14%) and it drops to 7% with the f/11.
The situation at 200 mm is very similar. For f/5.6 we notice 32% light fall off in the corners (-1.12 value of the diaphragm). For f/8 it drops to 16% and for f/11 it is 8%.
In conclusion, Nikkor does not deserve any applause in this category. As an example, the Tamron 18-200 had just as weak results at 18 mm, while at the rest of the focal length range the Tamron, with its 10-18% for wide open aperture, had much better results than the Nikkor.