Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200 mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD
11. Summary
- very solid, dust/splash proof barrel,
- very good picture quality at all focal and aperture range in the frame center,
- good frame edge picture quality,
- well corrected chromatic aberration,
- low distortion,
- average coma,
- vignetting properly reined in,
- autofocus silent and accurate.
Cons:
- noticeable astigmatism,
- average work against the light,
- autofocus can get lost in worse lighting.
Looking at the list of pros and cons of the tested Olympus and other 70-200 mm f/2.8 lenses, produced by Canon or Nikon, we see that the Olympus fares a bit worse. Is this a serious problem? I don’t think so. Don’t forget that the ZD 50-200 mm costs just about 1100 $ so still within range of advanced amateur photographers. The list of its advantages is really impressing and everybody who decides to buy it will get highly satisfactory results for sure.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
One question that remains to be explained is the independent manufacturers’ offer. There is another Four Thirds lens already available: a very promising Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8, around 300 $ cheaper than the Olympus and a bit faster. If only the Tamron 70-200 mm f/2.8 had a Four Thirds mount and could work on an Olympus, the Four Thirds users would have a really interesting choice and more competition would also mean lower prices.
Sample shots: