Sigma 120-400 mm f/4.5-5.6 APO DG OS HSM
11. Summary
- good or very good image quality for the range 120-300 mm,
- solid body and good build quality,
- well-controlled chromatic aberration,
- small vignetting,
- slight distortion,
- correctly-controlled astigmatism,
- small coma,
- silent and quite fast autofocus,
- abounding equipment,
- two-year warranty with the option of extending on another year.
Cons:
- too weak image quality at 400 mm,
- large weight and dimensions compared to the competition,
- bad work against bright light,
- mediocre accuracy of the focusing mechanism.
The first question that crossed my mind after testing Sigma 120-400 mm OS was connected with not having the EX symbol on the body. Why didn’t Sigma rate this lens to its highest class, even though the body is very solid, we have HSM motor, stabilization, abounding equipment, APO letters and three low-dispersion elements inside? I guess that we can now answer this question. Sigma didn’t want to compete with lenses like Canon 100-400 IS or Nikkor 80-400 mm VR, aiming at a lower segment of the market. That’s why Sigma falls optically behind much more expensive brand competitors, but potentially settles in a much cheaper segment, counting that it will interest a whole lot of users, who can’t afford to spend over 1700 $ on a telephoto lens.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This way it created a strong competition for Tokina 80-400 mm, which is about 300 $ cheaper than Sigma, but doesn’t give us stabilization or an ultrasonic focusing motor. The advantage of Tokina is a larger range, smaller dimensions and better brightness at 300 mm (Tokina has f/5.0, Sigma already f/5.6), the disadvantage being worse behavior at longer focal lengths and much bigger chromatic aberration.
We, as clients, should be happy that the choice in this class has gotten bigger. We have Tokina, we have Sigma and for those who can afford it, we have the most expensive products of brand producers. A wide selection here.
Sample shots