Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 12-60 mm f/2.8-4.0 SWD
8. Vignetting
If you want to be objective, though, you must compare this result to the performance of the lenses mentioned in the chapter concerning distortion, with the same angle of view as the ZD 12-60 mm at 12 mm. Against such a background the lens fares very well because the other devices had brightness losses reaching as much as 42-49%.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The situation is much better in the middle of the focal range, where vignetting practically doesn’t cause any problems at all. At 23 mm and by f/3.4 the light fall-off in the frame corners amounts to only 11% (-0.34 EV) and it decreases to 9% by f/4.0. At 40 mm and maximum relative aperture the vignetting is 15% (-0.46 EV), decreasing to 12% by f/4.0 and to 7% by f/5.6.
A tad worse performance is noticed at the maximum focal length where, by f/4.0, the vignetting reaches 21% (-0.68 EV). Fortunately by f/5.6 it decreases to the level of 12% and by f/8.0 it disappears completely (6%).