Canon EF 50 mm f/1.4 USM
11. Summary
- good frame centre sharpness (apart from the maximum aperture),
- very good frame edge picture quality on APS-C,
- good frame edge picture quality on full frame,
- well corrected astigmatism,
- low chromatic aberration,
- lack of distinct geometric deformations at frame edges,
- fast, silent and accurate autofocus,
- solid and compact barrel,
- good build quality.
Cons:
- by f/1.4 the image is distinctly „soft”,
- very high coma,
- susceptibility to flares,
- visible distortion on full frame,
- very high vignetting on full frame.
The Canon EF 1.4/50 USM is undoubtedly a well-done lens. The picture quality in the frame centre and at the edges is very good at apertures above f/2.0 – you can count it among the biggest assets of this device, apart from the solid workmanship. You should notice, though, that there were several slip-ups during the test. The lens, while working against bright light, catches light artifacts easily and its performance by f/1.4 is far from good with the visible coma, perceptible vignetting (being actually huge on full frame) and distinctly “soft” image.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
What do we get, then, for 270 $ more, as such is the price difference between 1.4/50 and 1.8/50? Firstly the fastness. Theoretically there’s not much difference between 1.4 and 1.8 apertures but we must point out that it means as much as 65% photons more! You must remember that on stopping down the 1.4/50 lens to the maximum aperture of the 1.8/50 lens most of faults, mentioned earlier, disappear. The build quality and the USM motor are additional bonuses.
If we take the photography seriously and demand of a lens that it is reliable in every situation, it’s better to invest your money in the 1.4/50 model. An amateur photographer who watches every penny can easily save 270 $ buying the 1.8/50 model, which, considering its quality/price ratio, is one of the best offers on the market. The problem is that you must treat it with kid gloves afterwards.
A short personal digression at the very end. So far, I’ve been using a Canon kit lens to take photos of lenses and binoculars presented by our forum. Typically, I had to take 30-40 shots to choose 3-4 of them, the most publishable ones. Here’s the fact that might make you aware how superior and comfortable the work with the Canon 1.4/50 is: during the latest session I decided to use it to take several shots of some lenses; I took about 30 pics but this time almost all of them were suitable for publication….
Sample shots: