Tokina AT-X 165 PRO DX AF 16-50 mm f/2.8
6. Distortion
|
Canon 17-55 IS |
Nikkor 18-70 |
Sigma 18-50 Macro |
Tamron 17-50 |
Tokina 16-50 |
beginning |
-2.47%
|
-4.50%
|
-3.90% |
-3.70% |
-4.10%
|
middle |
1.06% |
0.20% |
-0.77% |
0.24% |
-0.22% |
end |
1.38% |
0.90% |
0.11% |
0.97% |
0.69% |
The most expensive Canon 17-55 mm sticks out in a positive sense among all these instruments. The Nikkor 18-77 mm differs in a negative way for a change but it might be explained by its wider range of focal lengths. The Sigma and the Tamron seem to fare equally well. The Tokina is a bit worse than them but it features 16 mm focal length, not 17 or 18 like its rivals. We can state that the three lenses from independent companies are on a similar level.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Compared to the Nikon, on the Canon 20D the distortion level didn’t change. At the widest angle it amounts to –4.03% and it decreases to 0.2% in the middle of the range, to reach 0.73% at the end. Such results are, within the margin of error, the same as on the D200.