Sigma 85 mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM
5. Chromatic aberration
By f/1.4 the situation is not good and the level of aberration – significant. It is a frequent problem of fast lenses. Fortunately, contrary to the Nikkor, the stopping down is very effective because already by f/2.8 that aberration becomes not very bothersome.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Let’s check how the Sigma corrects the lateral chromatic aberration.
On the graph you can see that there are no problems whatsoever. Its value, within the margin of error, is the same on the edge of the APS-C/DX sensor and the full frame sensor - in the vicinity of 0.04% so a level deemed by us to be very low.
To compare the performance of the Sigma and its competitors in an objective way we decided to create a chart including all average aberration values ranging from f/1.4 to f/16, measured on the edge of the APS-C/DX and full frame sensor.
|
Sigma 1.4/85 |
Nikkor AF-S 1.4/85 |
Canon 85 mm f/1.2L II |
Samyang 1.4/85 |
Zeiss 1.4/85 |
APS-C/DX |
0.040%
|
0.062% |
0.058% |
0.051%
|
0.033%
|
FF |
0.039% |
0.066% |
0.092% |
0.036% |
0.042% |
Although the differences between particular lenses are small and all devices fare well or very well here, the best are the cheapest instruments so the Samyang, the Sigma and the Zeiss. The most expensive ones – the Nikkor and the Canon- are a bit worse.