Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G
4. Image resolution
Trying to avoid what is unavoidable would be foolish so let’s state at once that the graph above doesn’t impress us much. The main reason is the performance at the maximum relative aperture. In the frame centre the lens reaches only 25 lpmm when the decency level is situated near 30-31 lpmm. It is a bit sad – after all we buy a very expensive, professional lens of this class in order to get a useful relative aperture. In the case of the Nikkor we are disappointed as the lens’s performance lacks a lot here. You can remind here that the Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM didn’t have any problem with providing useful images by f/1.4.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Is there any consolation? Fortunately there is. By implementing f/1.8 –f/2.0 apertures we can make images useful. What’s more, on further stopping down you see a very steep improvement of image quality so by f/4.0 we get record values of over 46 lpmm. Resolution records are exactly the kind of results we expect from this type of lens. However, I suppose everybody would give up these several lpmm by f/4.0 just to get the same number of lpmm more by f/1.4…
The frame edge doesn’t console us much. On the smaller DX sensor and on full frame we must stop down the lens to f/2.8 to get rid of low image quality. Once again it is not a performance we expect from an expensive, fixed-focal system lens.
It’s worth adding that the results we got on the D3x caused so much consternation among our editorial office staff that we decided to perform one more photo session – this time based on the Nikon D200. Unfortunately the results weren’t even slightly better, remaining in perfect accordance, within the margin of error, with the numbers we had got previously.
The photos below presents our test chart crops taken from JPEG files saved along RAW files.