Canon EF-S 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
11. Summary
- good image quality in the frame centre in the whole range of apertures and focal lengths,
- decently corrected coma,
- efficient image stabilization,
- autofocus in good working order.
Cons:
- average image quality on the edge of the frame,
- chromatic aberration corrected weakly,
- significant distortion,
- huge vignetting,
- distinct astigmatism at the shortest focal length,
- modest accessory kit.
The mere comparison of the lists of pros and cons shows that our summary can’t be positive. Good and even but not splendid work in the frame centre is simply not enough a reason for a lens to be only praised. Its main problem is the fact that it doesn’t offer more than the rivals – rather the opposite is true. There is no USM motor, which can be found in similar Nikkor, Sigma or Tamron constructions. Optically it fares worse than lenses with even wider focal range. What’s the point of buying the Canon when an owner of a Canon reflex camera can buy better lenses, with a wider focal lengths range like, e.g. the Sigma 18-250 mm OS or the Tamron 18-270 mm VC for a similar price?
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sample shots