Canon EF 40 mm f/2.8 STM
11. Summary
- a nifty, compact casing,
- excellent image quality in the frame centre,
- good image quality on the edge of the APS-C sensor,
- right correction of chromatic aberration,
- slight distortion,
- practically no astigmatism,
- moderate vignetting on the APS-C sensor,
- very good work against bright light,
- silent and accurate autofocus,
- good price/quality ratio.
Cons:
- huge vignetting on full frame.
The results of the Canon EF 40 mm f/2.8 STM are a very nice surprise. Preparing myself for testing this “pancake” I expected a lot of problems on the edge of full frame sensor. There were some problems but not very serious ones – you can easily wave them aside. The mere comparison of the cons and pros lists proves this device is really worth your interest.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
You can also wonder why the producer didn’t implement a bit faster aperture. The combination of f/2.8 and 40 mm focal length is available for every user of 24-70 mm f/2.8 class lens or a 17-55 mm f/2.8 device for smaller sensors. Still you should remember that such constructions are expensive and optically they can fare worse than the “pancake” tested here. Full frame has also a bigger potential so the Canon 2.8/40 will be able to provide a shallower depth of field than the Panasonic G 20 mm f/1.7 ASPH, so praised and valued in the little world of mirrorless devices.
Sample shots