Voigtlander Nokton 17.5 mm f/0.95 Aspherical
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
There are a bit less problems with astigmatism but it doesn’t mean that aberration has no negative impact whatsoever on the image quality. An average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 values amounted to 13% - a noticeable level.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Looking at photos, presented below you can find out how defocused images of light points look like. There are no significant concentric rings and sharp edges so it might suggest that the blurred area will be nice. The influence of the spherical aberration, already discussed earlier, and vignetting, which will be described in the next chapter, is clearly visible for a change. The appearance of the circle by f/0.95 is a classic example of a badly corrected spherical aberration and, simultaneously, for some users a perfect way to get a great bokeh of defocused areas.