Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
When it comes to the astigmatism you shouldn’t be bothered either. An average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values amounted to 4% which is a very good performance.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
You can’t have any serious reservations concerning the defocused light points. Perhaps the light spread is not perfectly even but the local extremes and rings are not very intensive. There is just one thing that makes us worried – even after a significant stopping down of the lens the circle is significantly distorted in the frame corner. If you want to know how the circles should look like in this type of equipment have a glance at this chapter of our Zeiss Distagon T* 35 mm f/1.4 ZF.2 test.
An additional effect which many people might not like is the splitting of straight lines behind the focus – some of our sample shots show it pretty well.