Panasonic G X VARIO 35-100 mm f/2.8 P.O.I.S.
11. Summary
- compact, solid and small casing which doesn’t change its dimensions,
- excellent image quality in the frame centre,
- good image quality on the edge of the frame,
- very well corrected chromatic aberration,
- low spherical aberration,
- negligible coma,
- moderate astigmatism,
- excellent, fast and silent autofocus,
- very efficient image stabilization.
Cons:
- huge vignetting,
- surprisingly high distortion at the shortest focal length,
- work against bright light could have been better.
We praised the 12-35 mm model so it would be difficult not to praise the 35-100 mm one, especially that it fares a tad better. It works nicer against bright light, its vignetting, coma, astigmatism, chromatic and spherical aberration levels are lower. I loses to its smaller brother only when it comes to the sharpness on the edge of the frame. The high distortion level is also something strange – with such a range of angles of view it shouldn’t have been so pronounced. However, it is characteristic of the system – it never corrects the distortion, not even if it would be easy to do so.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It should be mentioned that the 35-100 mm model costs about 1000 PLN more than the 12-35 mm one. You get a more complex optical construction in a sealed, compact casing which will never allow dirt inside.
To sum up it is another interesting lens, certainly worth your attention. It completes the line-up of Micro 4/3 system devices in a very nice way.
Sample shots