Tamron SP 70-200 mm f/2.8 Di VC USD
6. Distortion
|
Sigma 70–200 OS |
Tamron 70–200 VC |
Nikkor 70–200 VRII |
Tamron 70–200 |
Canon 70–200 IS |
70 mm |
−0.66%
|
−0.34% |
−0.26% |
−0.46%
|
−0.39%
|
135 mm |
0.31% |
0.18% |
0.49% |
0.36% |
0.31% |
200 mm |
0.66% |
0.39% |
0.70% |
0.64% |
0.54% |
It’s worth noticing that at longer focal lengths it’s the new Tamron exactly which has the lowest pincushion distortion level. The barrel distortion at the shortest focal length is not the smallest but still low enough not to lag behind the results of the competition.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The distortion on full frame is higher for obvious reasons. At 70 mm we got “barrel” of –0.95%; in the middle of the focal range there was “pincushion” of 0.32% which additionally increased to 0.85% on passing to 200 mm. As the absolute value of distortion didn’t exceed 1% in any place the lens deserves a lot of praise - none of its competitors managed such a trick! Anyway, let’s glance at the chart below which compares the results other 70-200 mm f/2.8 lenses got in this category.
|
Sigma 70–200 OS |
Tamron 70–200 VC |
Nikkor 70–200 VRII |
Canon 70–200 IS |
70 mm |
−1.36%
|
−0.95% |
−0.78% |
−0.62%
|
135 mm |
0.75% |
0.32% |
0.85% |
0.74% |
200 mm |
1.59% |
0.85% |
1.39% |
1.36% |
The best result in such a select company is undoubtedly something to be proud of and a good opportunity to praise the tested lens some more.
Canon 50D, 70 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 135 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 200 mm | |||
Canon 1Ds MkIII, 70 mm | |||
Canon 1Ds MkIII, 135 mm | |||
Canon 1Ds MkIII, 200 mm | |||