Sigma A 24-105 mm f/4 DG OS HSM
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
The astigmatism is low. An average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values amounted to 3.6%. We also noticed a slight growth tendency with the increase of the focal length: at 24 mm that aberration is just 1.0%, at 105 mm it already reaches 5.5%.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Once again in this category the Sigma fares slightly better than the Canon 24-105L and the Nikkor 24-120 VR which astigmatism was 4.3-4.4%. Still the difference is merely cosmetic, its volume comparable to the measurement errors.
Defocused light points provide images which are far from perfect. First of all you get a lot of concentric rings (the so-called onion bokeh) – the effect is visible although not as strong as in the case of e.g. the Sigma 1.4/35. Additionally the intensity of the rim on the edge increases on stopping down and the images of the circle in the frame corners are distinctly truncated. Here the vignetting makes itself felt - we are going to write about it more in the next chapter.