Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-40 mm f/2.8 ED PRO
6. Distortion
As our test concerns the performance of the lens itself we also checked how the optics dealt with distortion without any help; we did it by developing RAW files with the dcraw program which doesn’t correct automatically the geometric flaws of the lens. In that case, at the wide angle, you have to take into account a huge level of barrel distortion, reaching a level of –6.32%. For comparison, at the same focal length the Panasonic 12-35 mm f/2.8 got –6.54%, a tad higher result than that of the Olympus. With the increase of the focal length the distortion decreases: at 14 mm it still remains high, amounting to –5.11%, and at 25 mm it reaches just –0.60%. At higher focal lengths there is a sign change and at 40 mm you already see pincushion distortion of 0.80%.
It is an interesting fact that the Olympus, featuring a wider focal range that the Panasonic 12-35 mm, has better distortion results almost across the range. Unfortunately, though, it is clear the constructors didn’t even try to control distortion effectively, ceding that task completely to the software. We definitely don’t like such an approach because correcting such a high distortion level entails significant cropping of images.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Olympus E-PL1, 12 mm, JPEG | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 25 mm, JPEG | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 40 mm, JPEG | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 12 mm, RAW | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 25 mm, RAW | |||
Olympus E-PL1, 40 mm, RAW | |||