Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 II
6. Distortion
In the chart below you see how the Canon compares to its rivals.
|
Nikkor AF-S 1.8/50G |
Nikkor AF 1.8/50D |
Canon EF 1.4/50 |
Canon EF 1.8/50 II |
Minolta 1.7/50 |
APS-C/DX |
−0.49% |
−0.20% |
−0.49% |
−0.39% |
−0.30% |
FF |
−1.18% |
−0.49% |
–1.98% |
–1.28% |
−0.68% |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The performance of the Canon is hardly impressive. Two things really stick up: firstly the distinctly better result of the Nikkor 1.8/50D, secondly the worse result of the Canon 1.4/50. Strange but true: the cheaper, slower Canon 1.8/50 manages to correct distortion better than its f/1.4 brother. Go figure.
Canon 50D, 50 mm | |||
Canon 5D MkIII, 50 mm | |||