Venus Optics LAOWA STF 105 mm f/2 (T3.2)
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
Center, f/2.0 | Corner APS-C, f/2.0 | Corner FF, f/2.0 |
Center, f/2.8 | Corner APS-C, f/2.8 | Corner FF, f/2.8 |
When it comes to the astigmatism, understood as an average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values the lens performs as it should. The value measured by us amounted to just 2.3% - it means that aberration shouldn’t bother you at all.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Providing out-of-focus areas pleasing to the eye was one of the tasks of this lens and without doubts it performs very well. When you look at the circles, there’s just one objection: the influence of mechanical vignetting (a strong truncation of the circle in the frame corner) and the already mentioned random performance of the 9-blade diaphragm on significant stopping down.
Center, f/2.0 | Corner APS-C, f/2.0 | Corner FF, f/2.0 |
Center, f/2.8 | Corner APS-C, f/2.8 | Corner FF, f/2.8 |
Center, f/4.0 | Corner APS-C, f/4.0 | Corner FF, f/4.0 |
When you employ the second, 14-blade aperture, the problems with roundness disappear. The circles look nice - a slight brightness loss on the edges which is supposed to guarantee pleasant, silky bokeh still remains noticeable.
Center, f/2.0, T4.0 | Center, f/2.8, T5.6 | Center, f/4.0, T8.0 |