Sigma A 12-24 mm f/4 DG HSM
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
Center, 12 mm, f/4.0 | Corner APS-C, 12 mm, f/4.0 | Corner FF, 12 mm, f/4.0 |
Center, 18 mm, f/4.0 | Corner APS-C, 18 mm, f/4.0 | Corner FF, 18 mm, f/4.0 |
Center, 24 mm, f/4.0 | Corner APS-C, 24 mm, f/4.0 | Corner FF, 24 mm, f/4.0 |
When it comes to the astigmatism understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values, it amounted to 3.2%. The results below 5% we consider to be low so it seems the Sigma 12-24 mm corrects that off-axis aberration very well; anyway its result is a tad better than the result of the more expensive Canon 11-24 mm.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
With such a focal range and aperture values it is very difficult to get big out-of-focus areas in photos so appraising the lens in this category is a bit art for art’s sake. Still it’s worth noticing that defocused circles of light look sensible; their only flaw is a lighter rim. What’s important, there are no traces of distinct mechanical vignetting.
Center, 24 mm, f/4.0 | Corner APS-C, 24 mm, f/4.0 | Corner FF, 24 mm, f/4.0 |
Center, 24 mm, f/5.6 | Corner APS-C, 24 mm, f/5.6 | Corner FF, 24 mm, f/5.6 |
Center, 24 mm, f/8.0 | Corner APS-C, 24 mm, f/8.0 | Corner FF, 24 mm, f/8.0 |