Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 12 mm f/1.4 ASPH
5. Chromatic and spherical aberration
Chromatic aberration
The tested lens experiences noticeable problems with longitudinal chromatic aberration. That aberration is more distinct in the case of the Panasonic GX80 than in the case of the Olympus E-M5 Mark II due to differences in filters transmittance but you can notice it in both cases and it remains quite visible.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Its highest level can be observed at the maximum relative aperture where we got almost 0.08%; still for most of other apertures the results were closer to 0.06% so you deal here with values we consider to be low.
Olympus E-PL1, RAW, f/1.4 | Olympus E-PL1, RAW, f/5.6 |
Spherical aberration
First photos from this chapter don’t feature any ‘focus shift’ effects so the tested lens cannot have big spherical aberration problems. Still the circles of light, shown below, prove that aberration is not corrected in a perfect way – they are not identical, the one we got before the focus has darker centre and the one after the focus is lighter inside.
Olympus E-M5 II, f/1.4, in front of | Olympus E-M5 II, f/1.4, behind |