SainSonic Kamlan 50 mm f/1.1
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
X-T2, f/1.1, center | X-T2, f/1.1, corner |
X-T2, f/2.0, center | X-T2, f/2.0, corner |
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values, reached 12.8%. It is a result still considered by us as medium but dangerously close to a high level.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In such a cheap and fast lens aperture-wise, the appearance of out-of-focus areas is very important because it can make or break the deal for many potential buyers. A creative usage of these blurry parts of the photo, which are only too common in any frame, is one of the most important features for users of such constructions. We are pleased to say there are no reasons to complain. You can notice just a distinct influence of mechanical vignetting – an unavoidable flaw with such an aperture and physical dimensions – and brightness decrease near the edge connected to spherical aberration. Apart from that the circles look nice, with a smooth and buttery light spread, without any local extremes. It seems the bokeh, produced by this lens, will certainly find a lot of devoted fans.
X-T2, f/1.1, center | X-T2, f/1.1, corner |
X-T2, f/2.0, center | X-T2, f/2.0, corner |
X-T2, f/2.8, center | X-T2, f/2.8, corner |