Tamron 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD
11. Summary
Pros:
- sealed construction,
- excellent image quality in the frame centre,
- good image quality on the edge of the APS-C/DX sensor,
- lack of any serious problems with longitudinal chromatic aberration,
- slight lateral chromatic aberration,
- not especially bothersome spherical aberration,
- low vignetting on the APS-C/DX sensor,
- good performance against bright light,
- very low astigmatism,
- lack of any serious coma problems,
- accurate autofocus,
- 5-year warranty period,
- good price-quality and price-performance ratio.
Cons:
- significant vignetting on full frame,
- noticeable distortion on the wider end of the focal range,
- slow, audible autofocus.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My fascination with this lens has also a different source. I travel a lot and often attend different photographic events. As a keen landscape and astrophotographer I don’t like heavy devices. Even if I am impressed by the performance of such lenses as the Tamron 15–30 mm f/2.8 or the Nikkor or the Sigma 14–24 mm f/2.8, I don’t think I would like to buy them - they seem too burdensome, too big, and they don’t cooperate with normal filters. When compared to these, the Tamron 17–35 mm f/2.8–4 Di OSD is small, lightweight and noticeably cheaper. It also features a 77 mm filter thread. To be honest I wouldn’t mind to make friends with it for a longer period of time.