Sigma A 35 mm f/1.2 DG DN
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
Center, f/1.2 | Corner APS-C, f/1.2 | Corner FF, f/1.2 |
Center, f/1.7 | Corner APS-C, f/1.7 | Corner FF, f/1.7 |
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 values, amounted to 7.5%. It's a moderate level which shouldn't worry you. It's worth noticing that the aberration will be visible mainly by f/1.2 and f/1.4; by f/2.0 it becomes practically imperceptible.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Defocused circles of light look good but we have some reservations concerning two things. Firstly, aspherical elements in the construction caused a slight onion ring bokeh effect. Secondly, and a far more important problem, we noticed mechanical vignetting and cropping of circles in frame corners, an effect which, by f/1.2, is really significant. How does it influence brightness loss in the frame corners? That question will be answered in the next chapter.
Center, f/1.2 | Corner APS-C, f/1.2 | Corner FF, f/1.2 |
Center, f/1.7 | Corner APS-C, f/1.7 | Corner FF, f/1.7 |
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |