Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 35 mm f/2 Aspherical
4. Image resolution
Let's check how the Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 35 mm f/2 Aspherical compares – its results in the frame centre and on edges of the APS-C sensor and full frame we present below.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The performance in the field centre makes us want to clap and cheer. Already at the maximum relative aperture the Apo Lanthar exceeds a very high level of 70 lpmm and by f/2.8 and f/4.0 it comes close to 80 lpmm. It is certainly a performance worth even the best fixed-focal lenses.
Just a slight decrease of resolution observed when you move away from the field centre is also worth noticing. On the edge of the APS-C sensor the results remain excellent because even at the maximum relative aperture the lens is able to come close to 60 lpmm and on stopping down the MTFs approach almost 70 lpmm.
Also the performance on the edge of full frame should be praised - you can't find any weak points there. By f/2.0 the values are near 50 lpmm so very safely above the decency level, and maximum results are able to reach a good level of 60 lpmm.
A graph below proves that, with such a performance, the Voigtlander can defeat its direct rivals hands down.
By f/2.0 and f/2.8 the Apo Lanthar remains unrivalled, simply outclassing other lenses. Only by f/4.0 the Sigma and the Batis are able match its performance. From f/5.6 onwards the results of the Voigtlander are a tad lower than these of other lenses; it might stem not from optical properties but from a specific closure of the aperture - from f/4.0 its shape is rather untypical.
At the end of this chapter, traditionally, we present crops taken from photos of our resolution testing chart, saved as JPEG files along RAW files we used for the analysis above.
A7R III, JPEG, 35 mm, f/2.0 |
A7R III, JPEG, 35 mm, f/2.8 |