Sony E 11 mm f/1.8
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
Although the performance, observed here, is far from perfect it cannot be called very problematic either. It is something in-between, a medium level that, with these parameters and at this price-point, is only natural.
A7R III, f/1.8, center | A7R III, f/1.8, Corner |
A7R III, f/2.5, center | A7R III, f/2.5, Corner |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values, amounted to 5.8% so its influence on image quality is slight. Still, it's worth mentioning that it's the f/2.8 aperture, not, as usual, the maximum relative aperture, that contributes the most to that value. It solves the mystery of the local minimum on resolution graphs we got on the edge of the frame.
The appearance of out-of-focus areas is really good for a wide angle lens. Light spread in the circles is quite even and onion-ring bokeh, caused by aspherical elements, is just moderately bothersome. We also didn't notice any serious problems with mechanical vignetting.
A7R III, f/1.8, center | A7R III, f/1.8, Corner |
A7R III, f/2.5, center | A7R III, f/2.5, Corner |
A7R III, f/3.5, center | A7R III, f/3.5, Corner |