OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90 mm f/3.5 Macro IS PRO
8. Vignetting
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 90 mm, f/3.5 | Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 90 mm, f/4.0 |
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 90 mm, f/5.6 | Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 180 mm, (TC), f/7.1 |
Here you can say that the lens doesn't have any significant problems with vignetting and the possibilities of the small detector have been used to the full. Vignetting can be noticed only by f/3.5 and f/4.0 where it is, respectively, 27% (-0.91 EV) and 21% (-0.67 EV). By f/5.6 this aberration becomes completely invisible, reaching just 3% (-0.09 EV).
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
An even better situation can be observed when you attach the MC-20 teleconverter. In this case vignetting is negligible even at the maximum relative aperture. Amounting to just 4% (-0.11 EV).
So far we have analyzed JPEG files only but they weren't vignetting-corrected and significantly cropped because the lens has practically no distortion so its images doesn't have to be corrected. As a result vignetting on RAW files is basically the same as on JPEG files. The biggest difference we could find reached just one percentage point.
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, JPEG, 90 mm, f/3.5 |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, JPEG, 180 mm (TC), f/7.1 |