Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X
4. Image resolution
Let's check how the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X compares- its results in the frame centre, on the edge of the APS-C/DX sensor and on the edge of full frame presents a graph below.

Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
You can say at once that the results in the frame centre are excellent. At the maximum relative aperture the lens exceeds 75 lpmm and the maximum results we ot by f/4.0 raches over 86 lpmm. It is currently the highest result we noticed in all tests performed on the Nikon Z7 sensor. At the same time these results are a tad better than the results of the Tamron 90 mm f/2.8 Di III Macro VXD, tested by us not so long ago. You can notice it by glancing at a graph below that shows a comparison between the performance in frame centre of both models, mentioned before.

In case of the Tamron we indicated a huge difference between the results in the frame centre and its edges. Unfortunately, in case of the Laowa this problem gets even more acute. It's obvious the producers focused rather on excellent performance in the frame centre and they neglected the edges.
The edge of the APS-C/DX sensor doesn't give you any reasons to complain, because even at the maximum relative aperture you still deal with a good level of over 57 lpmm. Still the MTFs don't increase as fast as you wish they did so the lens is able to get to almost 65 lpmm at most and it means as many as 15 lpmm of difference between the edge and the frame centre.
You can have a tad more reservations when it comes to the performance on the edge of full frame. Both by f/2.8 and by f/4.0 you land below 50 lpmm – a still decent value but in our humble opinion a good quality macro lens should have performed a tad better.
To sum up you can't say that in the resolution category the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X had any significant slip-up. Its performance in the frame centre is excellent and praise-worthy. Still, it cannot change the fact that excellent performance made us want more and, as a result, our expectations concerning the edge of the frame increased. We are sorry to say our appetites concerning that part of the test remained unquenched.
At the end of this chapter, traditionally, we presents crops taken from photos of our resolution testing chart; they were saved as JPEG files along with RAW files we used for the analysis above.
Nikon Z7, JPEG, 90 mm, f/2.8 |
![]() |
Nikon Z7, JPEG, 90 mm, f/4.0 |
![]() |