Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM
8. Vignetting
No matter how you look at it, Sigma performs the best here as well, although you need to remember that at the widest angle it has aperture slightly worse than the competitors. There, the light falloff in the corners of the frame amounts to 37% (-1.34 EV). When using f/5.6 aperture this value falls to 21%, to reach 15% at f/8.0 and go to an unnoticeable level of 11% at f/11.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
At 35 mm focal length and f/4.5 aperture the vignetting totals 28% (-0.95 EV). After stopping down to f/5.6 the value falls to 20% and, at f/8.0, to 9%.
At 70 mm the situation looks similarly. At maximum aperture the light falloff in the corners of the frame totals 27% (-0.91 EV), at f/8.0 falls to 11% and at f/11 equals only 4%.
We didn’t record any distinct increase of vignetting at the maximum focal length either. At it and at the maximum aperture the light falloff in the corners amounts to 26% (-0.87 EV), and additionally after stopping down by one value the aberration becomes nearly unnoticeable (11%).
Summarizing, here again we don’t have some excellent results, but in its parameters’ class Sigma is an appliance positively standing out compared to the competitors.