Canon EF-S 18-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
6. Distortion
The chart below shows a comparison between the performance of the tested Canon and other lenses with similar parameters.
|
Canon 18–135 IS |
Sigma 18–125 OS |
Nikkor 18–105 VR |
Nikkor 18–135 |
Sony 16–105 |
16–18 mm |
−4.93%
|
−4.25% |
−5.00% |
−4.60%
|
−4.67%
|
35 mm |
1.15% |
0.78% |
1.44% |
2.40% |
0.97% |
70 mm |
1.41% |
1.37% |
1.97% |
2.30% |
1.38% |
105–135 mm |
1.24% |
1.19% |
1.92% |
2.00% |
1.26% |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As you see the Sigma 18-125 mm OS fares the best here, the second place goes to the Sony 16-105 mm and the Canon 18-135 mm IS is the third; the weakest results are showed by both Nikkors.
Canon 50D, 18 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 24 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 35 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 50 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 85 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 135 mm | |||