Pentax smc DA 35 mm f/2.4 AL
7. Coma and astigmatism
In order to have low astigmatism two conditions must be met. Firstly the aberration itself should be corrected well by the optical construction of a lens. Secondly, all optical elements of a lens should be put perfectly on optical axis and work well within. Any incorrect slopes make all off-axis aberrations “explode”, especially the astigmatism. In the case of the Pentax 2.4/35 both conditions were satisfied because the average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values amounted to just 5%.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
You must remember, though, that if many elements of a lens are made of plastics, it bodes ill for long and intensive usage of equipment. Such devices always remind me of a friend of mine who has bought a new Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 II and for less than a year really enjoyed the quality of images his lens provided. After some time, though, he noticed a significant decrease of resolution which manifested itself as huge coma and astigmatism. He sent the lens to its producer for service and it returned untouched, only with a disarmingly honest annotation: “Backlash appropriate for this class of equipment”. Take this story into consideration if you ever decide to buy “plastic” lenses.