Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200 mm f/2.8D ED
4. Image resolution
The high-class varifocal lenses in the middle of the frame can be serious competition for fixed focal length lenses. The situation at the edge of the frame is worse, and this is where we really see the instrument’s performance. The Nikkor is better than the Sigma in this category, which only at 70 mm focal length had perfect results (but only at the maximum aperture) and could be a threat to the Nikkor. After stopping down the lens, the Nikkor is the clear winner. At 135 mm focal length the Nikkor performs much better since its sharpness in the edge of the frame is almost the same as in the middle of the frame. At 200 mm focal length, both lenses have similarly average results.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To sum it up, we have to add that if you have the Nikkor 80-200 mm, you don’t need to worry about purchasing any fixed focal length lenses in the 80-135 focal length range. They won’t improve anything in the picture resolution category. Only at the 200 mm focal length do we feel like we have a zoom lens and not a fixed focal length lens.