LensTip.com

Lens review

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200 mm f/2.8D ED

25 October 2007
Arkadiusz Olech

7. Coma and astigmatism

The coma is corrected perfectly in our tested lens. In the pictures with the diode in the center and in the corner of the frame we cannot see any difference and the diode’s picture is almost identical in all the cases. The Nikkor deserves nothing but applause!

Please Support Us

If you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200 mm f/2.8D ED - Coma and astigmatism

If not coma and chromatic aberration then maybe the astigmatism causes the weaker performance in the maximum aperture area. According to our test results this hypothesis seems to be the most probable since the average difference between the horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values in our tested lens is 15%, which is a little bit of a disappointing result in this class of equipment. By comparison, the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 had a result of 2.5% in this category.