Canon EF-S 10-18 mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM
4. Image resolution
How the new Canon compares here? First let’s check its performance in the frame centre.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The perfectly even performance sticks out immediately. The results for all focal lengths coincide within the margin of error. What’s more, already at the maximum relative aperture – and across the whole focal range – the lens reaches a very high level of 50 lpmm. Taking into account the price of the lens and its purpose those results can be described as excellent.
Now let’s check whether an equally good performance can be seen on the edge of the frame.
The shortest focal length fares the worst here. At the maximum relative aperture you get just 33 lpmm so a tad lower than the decency level; still it is the only weak point. After a slight stopping down you reach the decency level and the bigger focal lengths don’t have any problems with exceeding it either, even with the lens wide open. On stopping down you can achieve a quite good level of 40 lpmm.
To sum up the lens didn’t let us down in any respect. Its constructors used to the full the fact that, with a narrower focal range and a slower aperture, it is easier to construct and correct properly than its more expensive brother, the EF-S 10-22 mm. They managed to create a very good and functional wide angle lens – a round of applause!
At the end we present a crop taken from the photo of our testing chart, saved as JPEG file along with RAW files which we used for the analysis presented above.