Irix 15 mm f/2.4 Blackstone
9. Ghosting and flares
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Still it’s difficult not to have an impression that high vignetting levels help fighting flares by damping down the brightness of images in the corners and quenching light artefacts. Let’s check how the flares look on stopping down.
According to our expectations the situation is not exactly rosy. The flares are distinct, they appear in different combinations of settings and often they are able to spoil the frame completely.
It’s worth noticing that by f/8.0 the vignetting level of the Irix remains noticeable what was shown in the previous chapter so it still helps fighting the flares. It’s worth checking the situation on the smaller sensor of the Canon 50D where the vignetting can no longer help the lens with that aberration.
This time you have no problems whatsoever with noticing light artifacts- either near the maximum relative aperture or on more significant stopping down.
Finally you should mention one more thing. Most of 14-15 mm lenses present on the market have in-built hoods. The Irix features a removable hood. If you want to be fair and compare it to, say, the Samyang 2.8/14 you should test it with the hood attached. Let’s glance at photos below to see the results.
There are perhaps some differences but they remain slight. To sum up, even after attaching the hood you cannot avoid noticeable light artefacts while working against bright light.