Sigma C 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM
5. Chromatic and spherical aberration
Chromatic aberration
The tested lens doesn’t have almost any problems with the longitudinal chromatic aberration. Photos below prove that the aberration is corrected well both at 200 and at 400 mm.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There are no problems either. The highest level of the aberration is reached at 300 mm after a significant stopping down but even at that place it can be assessed as just medium. In case of other combinations of apertures and focal lengths the chromatic aberration remains low or very low.
As you see, the Sigma doesn’t differ from its more expensive, brand name rivals. In fact all three lenses, described here, present a very even, top-level performance.
Canon 5D III, RAW, 200 mm, f/11 | Canon 5D III, RAW, 400 mm, f/16 |
Spherical aberration
First photos of this chapter don’t show any “focus shift” effect. Circles of light we got in front of and behind the focus aren’t identical but the differences between them are slight, concerning mainly the intensity of rim. It can be said that the tested Sigma doesn’t have any noticeable problems with spherical aberration.
Canon 5D III, 200 mm, f/5.6, in front of | Canon 5D III, 200 mm, f/5.6, behind |
Canon 5D III, 400 mm, f/6.3, in front of | Canon 5D III, 400 mm, f/6.3, behind |