Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM
6. Distortion
|
Canon EF 70–300 IS USM II |
Canon EF 70–300 L IS USM |
Sigma 70–300 OS HSM |
Tamron SP 70–300 VC USD |
70 mm |
−0.73% |
−0.58% |
−0.09% |
−0.10% |
135 mm |
+0.37% |
+0.50% |
+0.56% |
+0.80% |
200 mm |
+0.59% |
+0.73% |
+0.75% |
+0.82% |
300 mm |
+0.75% |
+0.76% |
+0.77% |
+0.81% |
In this category results reached by all lenses are very similar to each other. At the shortest focal length you deal with slight barrel distortion which change into a bit of pincushion at the longer end of the focal lengths spectrum. Their level never exceed 1% for any focal length or for any lens which means there are practically no distortion-related issues.
Now let’s check the situation on full frame – appropriate results are presented in a chart below.
|
Canon EF 70–300 IS USM II |
Canon EF 70–300 L IS USM |
Sigma 70–300 OS HSM |
Tamron SP 70–300 VC USD |
70 mm |
−1.93% |
−1.61% |
−0.04% |
−0.09% |
135 mm |
+0.91% |
+1.29% |
+1.55% |
+2.12% |
200 mm |
+1.45% |
+1.84% |
+1.79% |
+2.05% |
300 mm |
+1.79% |
+1.87% |
+1.89% |
+1.89% |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It is clear the tested Canon at the shortest focal length is the weakest – as the only lens it shows easily noticeable pincushion distortion. Still, because of that its longer end of the focal lengths spectrum fares better than the rivals. You get nothing for nothing…
Canon 50D, 70 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 135 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 200 mm | |||
Canon 50D, 300 mm | |||
Canon 5D Mark III, 70 mm | |||
Canon 5D Mark III, 135 mm | |||
Canon 5D Mark III, 200 mm | |||
Canon 5D Mark III, 300 mm | |||