Sigma A 14 mm f/1.8 DG HSM
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
The result of the Sigma is similar to the performance of the Irix and a bit weaker than that of the Samyang 2.8/14 at the same time. The Canon 2.8/14 II fared the weakest in this category.
Center, f/1.8 | Corner APS-C, f/1.8 | Corner FF, f/1.8 |
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values, amounted to 3.8%. That level is low so the tested lens should be praised here. The Irix had a very similar result and the Samyang 2.8/14 fared even better. In this company the Canon 2.8/14 II with its 17% looks like a beggar even though it is the most expensive lens in this group.
When it comes to out-of-focus images we have almost no reservations whatsoever. The light spread in the circles is very even, without any rims or local extremes. Even the ring on the very edge is not especially pronounced. Still if you take a closer look at the interior of the circles you’ll be able to notice traces of onion ring bokeh.
Center, f/1.8 | Corner APS-C, f/1.8 | Corner FF, f/1.8 |
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Center, f/3.5 | Corner APS-C, f/3.5 | Corner FF, f/3.5 |