Venus Optics LAOWA 15 mm f/2 ZERO-D
4. Image resolution
Now let’s check how the Laowa 2/15 compares here – the graph below presents its results in the frame centre, on the edge of the APS-C sensor and on the edge of full frame.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It is clear the tested lens is hardly the sharpest tool in the drawer, mainly because its maximum results. Near f/4.0 it is able to reach about 60 lpmm so a value by more than a dozen lpmm lower than the resolution of the best lenses of this system. You have to admit that difference is big.
Still calling the Laowa a failed lens would be preposterous. The 50-60 lpmm level ensures that you get images of good quality and the maximum relative aperture, with a result of over 49 lpmm, means your photos will be completely useful.
Still small physical dimensions of the lens combined with a bright aperture and an ultra wide angle of view made themselves felt on the edge of the frame. As a result, in order to get an image of a sensible quality on the edge of the APS-C sensor and on the edge of full frame, you have to stop down the aperture to near f/4.0. Additionally even by f/5.6 and f/8.0 the performance can hardly be called good as the MTFs exceed the decency level only slightly.
At the end of this chapter traditionally we present crops taken from photos of our resolution testing chart; they were saved as JPEG files along RAW files used for the analysis presented above.
A7R II, JPEG, f/2.0 |
A7R II, JPEG, f/4.0 |