Sony FE 50 mm f/2.5 G
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
The performance in this category is noticeably better than the performance of both, the Sonnar 1.8/55 and the Sony FE 1.8/50.
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Center, f/3.5 | Corner APS-C, f/3.5 | Corner FF, f/3.5 |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values, amounted to 2.6 %. It is a very low level so you can say the Sony won't experience any problems in this category.
Defocused circles of light look sensibly well. Defocused circles of light show effects of employing aspherical elements – they feature slight onion-ring structure. Mechanical vignetting is very strong by f/2.5 but, fortunately, it disappears completely on stopping down the aperture by 2 EV.
Center, f/2.5 | Corner APS-C, f/2.5 | Corner FF, f/2.5 |
Center, f/3.5 | Corner APS-C, f/3.5 | Corner FF, f/3.5 |
Center, f/5.0 | Corner APS-C, f/5.0 | Corner FF, f/5.0 |