Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO
11. Summary
Pros:
- solid and weather-sealed construction,
- very good image quality in the frame centre,
- good image quality on the edge of the frame up from the maximum relative aperture,
- negligible longitudinal chromatic aberration,
- low lateral chromatic aberration,
- proper coma correction,
- moderate astigmatism,
- decent vignetting correction,
- sensible performance against bright light,
- silent, fast, and accurate autofocus.
Cons:
- very high distortion on RAW files,
- noticeable vignetting at the 8 mm focal length (but only on RAW files).
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO didn't have any slip-ups and is an instrument which I can personally recommend without any objections. Its price, reaching $1100, is perhaps not that low but lenses with interesting, unique parameters never come cheap. If I, by force, wanted to find any flaw of this one I would mention the fact that I would be happier if the performance of the 8-25 mm model was on par with the performance of its 12-45 mm brother. Of course my expectations are one thing; I am aware that designing and producing an 8-25 mm model is more difficult than the production of the M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-45 mm f/4.0 PRO. Still in the case of the tested lens you get not only a very good sharpness in the frame centre but also practically no slip-ups on edges. At every focal length, up from the maximum relative aperture, you can enjoy good quality images across the frame, a really impressive achievement. Hats off!