Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
E-M5 II, 8 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 8 mm, f/4.0, Corner |
E-M5 II, 16 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 16 mm, f/4.0, Corner |
E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/4.0, Corner |
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between horizontal and vertical MTF50 function values, amounted to 8.9% -it's a value situated on the borderline between low and medium level. You can also mention the fact that this aberration is very low at the maximum focal length (just 3.3%), and distincly higher from 8 to 16 mm (about 11-12%).
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Blurry areas produced by the Olympus 8-25 mm don't look especially nice but with such wide angles of view and such a depth of field it would be difficult to get a better effect. The area of the circles is marked with a a brighter rim and aslo lot of heterogeneities caused most likely by aspherical elements, present inside the lens. Fortunately the influence of mechanical vignetting is negligible.
E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/4.0, Corner |
E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/5.6, center | E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/5.6, Corner |
E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/8.0, center | E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/8.0, Corner |