Sony E PZ 10-20 mm f/4 G
5. Chromatic and spherical aberration
Chromatic aberration
In a lens with such an aperture fastness and angle of view as that of the Sony PZ E 10-20 mm f/4 G you don't expect any serious problems with longitudinal chromatic aberration. Photos below prove that indeed you shouldn't worry about them at all.Lateral chromatic aberration might be a problem for instruments of this type for a change -let's check how the tested lens fared in this category.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It's clear that the higher focal length the lower the aberration. All values we obtained range from 0.04% to 0.06% - it means that levels of lateral CA are small or very small. The Sony lens fares here beyond reproach.
A7R III, RAW, 10 mm, f/16.0 | A7R III, RAW, 20 mm, f/16.0 |
Spherical aberration
A significant depth of field, provided by the tested lens, makes it difficult to notice any 'focus shift' effect. Still, it doesn't mean spherical aberration is corrected in a perfect way and defocused circles of light we got before and behind the focus are the proof. The differences between them are clear; it means this aberration influences images you reach near the maximum relative aperture.
A7R III, 20 mm, f/4, before | A7R III, 20 mm, f/4, after |