Voigtlander Nokton 35 mm f/1.2 X / Z
8. Vignetting
X-T2, JPEG, f/1.2 | X-T2, RAW, f/1.2 |
X-T2, JPEG, f/1.4 | X-T2, RAW, f/1.4 |
X-T2, JPEG, f/2.0 | X-T2, RAW, f/2.0 |
X-T2, JPEG, f/2.8 | X-T2, RAW, f/2.8 |
It is clear that vignetting is automatically corrected in JPEG files and you can't switch it off. The results are not bad at all. By f/1.2 brightness loss in the frame corners amounts to 35% (−1.25 EV) and it decreases to 31% (−1.10 EV) on stopping down the aperture to f/1.4. By f/2.0 this aberration drops to 19% (−0.62 EV), and by f/2.8 to 11% (−0.35 EV). By f/4.0 the problem disappears practically completely because the result we got there amounted to just 4% (-0.11 EV).
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Of course the real situation can be observed only by analyzing RAW files. In this case at the maximum relative aperture vignetting amounts to 60% (−2.67 EV). It is a very high value – but you have to keep in mind that you deal here with a very fast lens. Apart from that fast lenses designed for full frame mirrorless cameras usually have vignetting that exceeds 3 EV so a level of -2.67 EV is not especially shocking.
By f/1.4 vignetting decreases to 56% (-2.39 EV), and by f/2.0 it is 41% (-1.54 EV). Near f/2.8 you start to see a moderate level of this aberration with a result of 29% (-0.98 EV). The values keep decreasing also by f/4.0 and f/5.6 where light fall-off is, respectively, 20% (-0.65 EV) and 18% (-0.56 EV). Further stopping down doesn't have any measureable influence on the aberration described in this chapter.
Fujifilm X-T2, JPEG, f/1.2 |
Fujifilm X-T2, RAW, f/1.2 |